For the last few years, it's been a cliche of
the commercial world that to operate in the middle of a market is
suicidal.
The story has gone that it pays either to be an artisan at work in a shed or the employee of a corporate giant bloated on acquisition.
Scale has been a touchstone of competitive advantage.
To be middle-sized has been to be dull, fuzzy, a failing Old Maid kind of business.
And don't bother securitizing one mortgage. Wrap a bundle of them and find a better tomorrow.
Now all of this may be true. But I am starting to wonder.
In The Venturesome Economy, Professor Amar Bhidé of Columbia University takes x-ray specs to innovation:
For any new product, the underlying know-how ranges from the high-level general principles, to mid-level technologies, to ground-level context specific heuristics or rules of thumb.
Bhidé surveys a landscape of products that range
from high-level building blocks or raw materials (microprocessors or the silicon used to make them), to mid-level intermediate goods (the motherboards that contain the microprocessor in laptop computers), to ground-level final products (laptop computers).
different forms of innovation interact in complicated ways, and it is these interconnected, multilevel advances that create economic value.
Now none
Or signals the commercial promise of a middle-sized business that lacks focus or is in the wrong market.
It affirms the value of ideas, initiative and forces that operate at the mid-level - see my previous post on China - phenomena that act as an interface
between the high- and ground- levels in society, politics and culture.