For time immemorial, I've been trying to understand why and how we can orientate ourselves in immense, featureless, self-effacing spaces and landscapes like this one. And how and why standing in the middle of the Sahara Desert some years ago was a disorientating but invigorating experience.
Austrian architect and artist Lars Koretzky offers a clue in his recent book devoted to movement, the impressions within and between spaces in cities and lines that he sees swirling around. (!)
Koretzy quotes philosopher Gilles Deleuze and psychotherapist Felix Guattari's investigations of 'striated' and 'smooth space' in their book A Thousand Plateaus: two spatial arrangements with two systems: one that is State-oriented and static, the other nomadic and fluid.
In striated space, lines or trajectories tend to be subordinated to points:one goes from one point to another. In smooth space, it is the opposite: the points are subordinated to the trajectory...In the smooth space, the line is a vector, a direction and not a dimension or metric determination. It is a space constructed by local operations involving changes in direction....smooth space is filled by events or haecceities, far more than by formed or perceived things. It is a space of affects more than one of properties. Whereas in the striated, forms organize matter: in the smooth, materials signal forces and serve as symptoms for them. It is an intensive rather than an extensive space, one of distances, not of measures and properties.
In 2002, I visited the Western Desert of Egypt to make a documentary on nomadism and the design of the Pyramids.
When I stood in front of the enormity of the landscape, I felt as
though I was distributing myself across the space, almost surfing.
Now (maybe) I start to know why. It was a 'smooth space', occupied by intensities, wind and noise, forces, and sonorous and tactile qualities.